The incompleteness theorem is applicable and in our practice. A judgement of jurymen? There are no more biassed people, than
jurymen, nothing understanding subtleties and technologies of investigation and legal proceedings. They bolvanchiki in hands of
the public prosecutor and the lawyer. And here we at deadlock, and each judgement leaves in us a worm of doubt - and
suddenly we were mistaken? Take my a word, there is no more convincing and exact proof, than own suspicions and
recognitions of the suspect. Yes, yes, so. Here she is a tsarina of the proof. And as we liberally are adjusted, as we respect
human rights, and anywhere to us from it not to get to. I suspect that you are guilty, you will confirm my suspicions, that is
everything, a point. The end to a consequence, the court beginning. Think, reflect, and you will not find more exact criteria,
reliability constants. And it works not only here, it can be extended to other spheres of human life. The scientific theory - my and
your confidence that I was right. The state - your and my confidence that this fair device of a life